You Don't Need to Know

Appendix

Framework terms & glossary

The vocabulary of the framework, a glossary of trading terms, the cognitive biases most often seen in trading, and the three measures of outcome.

Framework Terms

The Trader
The Trade

Glossary of Trading Terms

Market Type
Directional Moves
Liquidity Events
Value & Auction Concepts
Reversals
Trading Types
  1. Holding Period
  1. Execution Style
  1. Strategy Objective

Cognitive Biases Observed in Trading

Perceptual Distortions

These operate at the input stage. They shape what the trader notices and how it is weighted before any reasoning begins.

Heuristic and Probability Errors

These are shortcuts that simplify complexity at the cost of systematic misjudgments about risk, randomness and future outcomes.

Emotional and Motivational Biases

These arise from fear, attachment and ego. They drive the emotional volatility behind poor discipline and inconsistent execution.

Interpretive and Narrative Biases

These distort how traders explain and justify market events after the fact, reinforcing overconfidence or rigidity.


Three Measures of Outcome

Three Different Objects

Each measures outcome in units of risk, but each applies to a different object.

Expectancy Is Not a Forecast

Expectancy is the average outcome a play is expected to produce across its instances, measured in units of initial risk. When positive, it is the play’s edge, expressed as a number:

Expectancy = the sum of each outcome multiplied by its estimated probability

(outcomes in R; losses counted as negative)

Expectancy Versus Expected Value

Expectancy and expected value use the same arithmetic but answer different questions. Expected value is what one setup is worth at its actual levels, based on the trader’s estimate for that instance. Expectancy is what the play is expected to return on average across many instances, based on its record.

The record gives an exact average of past results, not the expectancy itself. It is only an estimate: the sample is finite, markets change, and in an open-ended play the outcomes that matter most are the rarest.

A play with positive expectancy can still produce setups whose expected value falls below the strategy’s threshold. Refusing them keeps the play’s expectancy intact.

Expectancy belongs to the play; expected value belongs to the setup. Reading expectancy as a statement about the next trade confuses the two.

Realized Performance

Realized performance is the average outcome per trade across a series of closed trades: the sum of realized outcomes divided by the number of trades. It is the empirical counterpart to expectancy, and the basis for estimating it.

It can be expressed through the record’s win and loss frequencies:

Realized Performance =

(Hit Ratio × Average Gain) + ((1 − Hit Ratio) × Average Loss)

Where:

Hit Ratio = proportion of winning trades

1 − Hit Ratio = proportion of losing trades

Average Gain = average outcome per winning trade, in R

Average Loss = average outcome per losing trade, in R (negative value)